So this is the photo that apparently got me 'banned' from the LRG. Not that I knew much about it as I rarely visited the LRG. I joined a lengthy list of 'experts' banned from the LRG, that include Vasco, Beale, Davis and others. Was I bothered ? Not at all. If you want to visit the LRG go ahead. By the way, I worked hard on the 'precursor' to the LRG with Peter Evans, well before the current regime took over. And to think that I was defending Lorant. The problem was the image below, a KG 54 Me 262. The sceptics on that forum got in first with their arguments about manipulation, distortion, perspective etc etc.
" It is undoubtedly a fake in my opinion..."
" It is obviously a fraud which succeeded to fetch a large amount of money. The buyer should be made aware .."
Nothing wrong with a healthy dose of scepticism but these same 'sceptics' are not usually 'photo specialists'. It struck me that any Photoshop manipulation however professional could be detected under high magnification simply from a close examination - even size comparison - of the pixels ? The 'white arrow' flash on KG 54 training machines is already well known from other sources, although not admittedly in the single-seat variant.
and the response from Lorant, who paid nearly 4,000 euros for this image (yes, he's an idiot as well..)
" I will keep you informed if/when I have the photo in question in my own hands. I was the official responsible for the 9.5 million private and official photographs of the French Air Force held in the archives at Vincennes castle near Paris. I have been manipulating and reproducing original photos for over forty years and I will know very quickly if it is a counterfeit..."
".. I was able to examine yesterday and scan in high definition the original photo of Me262 A coded " AL.."
"...The original has many small scratches and imperfections as seen on original German photos of the same period. The picture is not sharp enough to read the Werk Nummer, nor the small 'B3' code of KG 54 that should be painted in front of the fuselage cross. The argentic grain of this print on old paper is perfectly homogeneous. This is obviously a perfectly original print..."
So, yes, a rare and genuine photo of Me 262 A-2 "Anton-Luise" assigned to 3./KG (J) 54 armed with two 30 mm cannon and displaying the letters A (gelb) and L (schwarz) aft of the fuselage Balkenkreuz. It is possible to make out the WNr, but not read it with 100% accuracy.
There are few 'experts' in this field with as much knowledge of the subject as Jean-Yves Lorant - in his professional life he managed the French Armed Forces photo archive (SHD at Vincennes) - some several millions of images. As he wrote on the LRG, " I am not sure that there are on this forum people who can claim an expertise superior to mine in this domain ".
I'm really surprised he didn't get banned from the LRG for that..
To close the discussion. A spectacular price was paid for this one image - but as someone who has sometimes spent a lot more money on trips to Germany for much less spectacular results put it;
" ..given my age (61), I will certainly never have the opportunity to see others comparable to this one. If anyone knows who is the lucky owner of the other Me 262 photos from the same seller, please send me a message. I thank you in advance..."
Now the internet 'fakers' and 'plunderers' just have to decide what type of Hakenkreuz - out of the six possibilities - to put on their 'copies'..
To close the discussion. A spectacular price was paid for this one image - but as someone who has sometimes spent a lot more money on trips to Germany for much less spectacular results put it;
" ..given my age (61), I will certainly never have the opportunity to see others comparable to this one. If anyone knows who is the lucky owner of the other Me 262 photos from the same seller, please send me a message. I thank you in advance..."
Now the internet 'fakers' and 'plunderers' just have to decide what type of Hakenkreuz - out of the six possibilities - to put on their 'copies'..